All Activity

Numerous advice from other users are available (also refer to the approximately three million other tire topics on this forum).However, after an incident over the weekend, I can unequivocally state "no" to the Chinese Autogreen tires. A buddy just acquired a pristine 318i coupe equipped with a pair of these aesthetically pleasing tires, which are evidently brand new and installed to ensure compliance with the MOT before to sale at little cost. They are not outdated inventory, since they have a date stamp from late 2024. He is having them replaced this week. He visited and took me on a drive just to demonstrate their poor performance. I have had many Chinese tires; now, my E350 CDI is equipped with a set of "Sunwide" rear tires, installed by the previous owner for the MOT. To be honest, I intended to replace them, but they are satisfactory.I anticipated his tires to be subpar but acceptable for the price; nevertheless, that was not the case. Intimidating is the term; it was arid and refined. The formidable 318i engine could effortlessly surpass traction even at moderate cornering velocities, and at the very least, it provided enough auditory warning before to losing control.They are, in fact, consistently audible. Those tires have endowed the automobile with the capacity for simultaneous oversteer and understeer! The owner possesses considerable driving expertise and enjoys utilising the vehicle's capabilities, having been well-instructed. However, a typical budget-conscious driver, using the vehicle for family transportation, could easily encounter perilous situations if opting for those tires. It is astonishing that they remain available for sale. Unpleasant...avoid!

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires on my 2019 E63S estate perform well, save for occasional skipping at low speeds on cold tires during winter. However, I also own a set of winter tires that I swap to when this issue becomes excessive.

I am now using Bridgestone tires on my 2016 SLK 300 AMG Sport. They are satisfactory. Relatively quiet and fairly comfy. Nonetheless, I remain unconvinced about their grip levels, especially under wet or slippery road conditions. I recently had a failure of the NSF wheel speed sensor, which disabled the ABS, stability control, and many other unexpected functions, including an alert to reduce speed when I was parked and attempting to raise the roof. Had to deactivate the engine, re-engage the ignition and raise the roof using the batteries. Following a period of rainfall, I exited a roundabout at 3 o'clock, exhibiting a degree of overzealousness with the accelerator. An spectacular 'tank slapper' occurred, which I barely managed to control. No. 2 Son (GR Yaris) advocates for Michelin Pilot Sports; nonetheless, what suggestions do you have for optimising traction? As a lifetime automotive enthusiast, I now drive seldom, averaging around 5,000 to 6,000 miles annually. All feedback is appreciated.

I opted for an economical choice and purchased a piece of indoor-outdoor carpeting that had sufficient texture to prevent items from slipping. It is also readily removable for dusting my camping equipment.

This is peculiar. The instructions indicate that there are two components, with the section nearer to the seat being foldable.

Intriguing. I have seen that the description for the link I shared indicates three items. I am uncertain about my feelings towards it; but, I believe I would need to see one to have a more informed perspective.

Affirmative, I own it. Functions effectively. It consists of three distinct components, which I choose since they are more manageable for removal

Affirmative. I prefer not to remove a rubber tray to reach the storage underneath. Consequently, the OEM seems to be the optimal choice.

Mine included the cushioned cargo lining. I would like the rubber cargo tray. We had OEM rubber cargo boxes in both our 2023 CX-5 and our previous 2016 CX-5, which we no longer own. They were well-fitted and well constructed.

Indeed. I am aware of that. 😃 I am enquiring about the OEM rubber cargo tray.

All CX70 models should include additional storage capacity. By lifting the cover from inside and folding it forward, more room is created; furthermore, a panel located slightly behind the back seats may be flipped for even greater capacity.

https://parts.medcentermazda.com/p/Mazda__CX-70/Cargo-Tray/147861241/KR9DV0360A.html?partner=googlebase_adwords&feedLabel=cvb_make_model&kwd=&matchtype=&device=m&network=g&userLocation=9002711&googleCampaignID=19966516712&googleAdGroupID=148866151838&googleAdID=654690657004&googleExtensionID=&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=19966516712&gbraid=0AAAAADxCSLt-0hTZuRv3_qg6pF0Vps2hf&gclid=CjwKCAjwt-_FBhBzEiwA7QEqyMIZJew7Ohym-LR02TBfSmt54UvWqpBgxv1yIvn-rbWVAUY8tj3YxRoCg9sQAvD_BwE

Does anybody own this? It seems to include recesses or grooves that facilitate folding, so granting access to the under-storage trays.

Precisely accurate, I would assert. Thoroughly clean the stick, and the portion over the maximum mark will be revealed as just residual oil that was not removed prior to inspection.

A commendable series of YouTube movies by a somewhat eccentric Russian individual demonstrates the precise volume (in litres) of oil required for an engine before the crankshaft aerates the lubricant; he used transparent Perspex sumps for clarity. It is a substantial quantity! Should I locate the videos, I will upload them thereafter.

That does not seem to exceed the maximum level; it only resembles an oil residue. If it were over the maximum, the maximum indicator would also be coated in oil.

I would trust the stick; but, I was concerned about the portion exceeding the maximum level. Uncertain on the sensitivity of the N47 engines. 😂

I concur, but felt it necessary to enquire.

Place confidence in the stick The stick is divine. I am old-fashioned and lack faith in such technologies.

The level on the dipstick is OK; disregard the notification and replace the level sensor during the next oil change. My previous 330d often displayed the warning, even though the oil level was enough; I replaced the sensor during the servicing.

The vehicle has just undergone servicing. 2011 F11 520d model. Following two brief journeys (about 5-10 km each), the engine oil high error appeared on the IDrive. The dipstick indicates a level slightly over the maximum, as seen in the image. I enquired with the mechanic, and he indicated that the amount would be acceptable. Do you propose draining some fluid or just operating it to allow for potential settling? Should the oil dipstick be examined immediately after driving or after the engine is completely cold? I have also seen information suggesting that it may relate to the incomplete cycle of the DPF regeneration. I possess substantial automotive expertise; nevertheless, this is my first experience with a diesel vehicle, so I appreciate any guidance.

Potentially. Consider operating the vehicle with the air conditioning deactivated to see whether the issue persists.

Indeed, my daughter suffers from asthma; thus, I use the car's heater for around ten minutes prior to the school run in the early morning. The standard air conditioning unit is erratic, so I use the adjacent button, the maximum setting. Image contained herein. Could this be the underlying cause?

Air conditioning systems generate condensate (water) during operation, which is expelled via a pipe to the ground. Is this the case?

Thank you. It evaporates rapidly, similar to water, and is certainly not greasy. Scuttle remains unverified; I will address it soon. Place white tissue paper below and await the opportunity to 'capture' anything.