All Activity
- Past hour
-
I currently possess a 420i, however I have been provided with a 420d six-speed manual loan vehicle for two weeks while my previous E92 is being fixed by the insurance company. I remember driving the 420d, which had considerable torque, and I certainly tested the car at every red light. That was my first experience driving a diesel vehicle, which differed significantly from driving a petrol one. If you seek a vehicle for commuting and daily use with little operating expenses, the 420d is suitable; it is unremarkable compared to my 420i but offers slightly more torque. However, if you desire enhanced performance, consider the six-cylinder option. I would personally refrain from opting for X-drive unless absolutely necessary, as it introduces a another potential failure point as the vehicle ages. There are already several concerns associated with an older BMW.
-
Avoid non-X drives; they exhibit several issues and are subpar overall.Not effective in snow, indeed.As Johnny states, the N57 is less reliable. I have consistently preferred a six-cylinder engine over a four-cylinder. However, aside from requiring a new chain at about 100,000 miles, the N47/B47 would be my preferred option.
-
Thank you for the counsel. I am eager to test drive both models; however, they are difficult to locate locally with the appropriate year, specifications, and miles. I prefer not to test drive a vehicle in which I lack genuine purchasing intent. I will likely travel south to procure one and return if everything is OK. In addition to evident concerns such as knocks or wobbles, what specific indicators should I observe or auditory cues should I heed during the test drive to identify potential faults with these vehicles?
-
The six-cylinder engine is far more refined and powerful; but, the N57 is prone to bottom-end damage, which may be rather expensive to repair. As the engine ages, its prevalence is increasing. The four-cylinder engine will be the B47, which has demonstrated greater reliability than its N47 predecessor. I recommend test-driving the 420d with the ZF8 automatic gearbox to assess its performance, as it is not a sluggish vehicle.
-
Greetings everyone, I am purchasing my inaugural BMW next month and am deliberating between a 2017/2018 420d M Sport and a 430d M Sport. I have viewed numerous YouTube reviews and perused a considerable number of online content, yet I remain conflicted. I desire excellent fuel efficiency, hence I am committed to diesel; yet, I also seek an exciting driving experience, as I will predominantly be on rural or secondary roads. I intend to perform most of the maintenance on the vehicle myself; wish me luck, as I have heard it can be quite challenging. My present vehicle has a 2008 2.0L petrol engine producing 150HP, hence either alternative will represent a significant enhancement. What is the fuel efficiency in miles per gallon (MPG) for mixed out-of-town and B-road driving? Is there a substantial distinction between the 2.0L and 3.0L engines? Is the 420d enjoyable to drive, or does the 430d provide a significantly superior experience? What other information should I be aware of that may not be covered in reviews or general information? I anticipate your insights.
-
Kia's exceptional rescue service contract with The RAC
Strongspoi replied to Cincoon's topic in General
Indeed. News editors mistakenly believe that achieving "balance" throughout a program suffices, disregarding the reality that the language employed in the headline serves as an earworm for the public (voters), who typically engage with only the initial 10 seconds of any topic and overlook the counterargument. Small boat crossings have increased. Allocate £350 million annually to the NHS instead. Many neglect to consider the balance. Currently, headlines are crafted by spin doctors and reproduced by journalists who lack the time to consider the repercussions, driven instead by the need to capitalise on the engagement generated by provocative openings. -
Ah! The potency of language! Few individuals engage with the news today, believing that the headlines alone suffice for their informational requirements. Large corporations invest substantial sums in sophisticated legal counsel to draft extensive terms and conditions, often spanning many foolscap pages, to safeguard the company against prospective litigation that might incur millions in costs. Consumer rights often lack clarity regarding customer expectations from business proprietors, and in disputes, few individuals possess the financial resources to confront corporate solicitors and insurance. KIA and Bluelink exemplify the extent to which they will safeguard their corporate interests, as evidenced by a thorough examination of the complete Terms and Conditions. It is undoubtedly more expedient to scroll to the conclusion and simply select the ‘Accept’ button, as I presume the majority of users do.😁
-
Kia's exceptional rescue service contract with The RAC
Strongspoi replied to Cincoon's topic in General
"Unparalleled" is effectively ambiguous for marketing purposes. The listener interprets it as unparalleled excellence, yet it is not the message conveyed by the marketing individual. (Similar to headache medication advertisements that claim no other tablet works more rapidly, but disclosing that no unbranded pill operates at a slower pace.) -
Sadly like many things, the service you get depends on the individual attending. Consider the multitude of distinct automobiles available. Anticipating that a recovery specialist possesses comprehensive knowledge of every individual is quite excessive.
-
After encountering multiple instances of rapid chargers failing to connect and supply power to our Niro 4+, we faced the humiliation of requiring assistance from the RAC to be transported to a charging station that would connect (Type 2, not CCS). Despite Kia's purported service agreement with the RAC, which claims to provide an exceptional rescue service for electric vehicles stranded due to power depletion, including on-board charging capabilities for minor top-ups to reach the nearest charging station, our experience did not meet these expectations. The RAC patrolman from a franchised garage possessed less knowledge of electric vehicles than we did, which is minimal, and lacked the expertise to properly load our car into a low loader, thus abandoning us upon arrival at a Type 2 charging station. Anything but "a Kia/RAC unparalleled rescue service." Are there any other experiences, preferably favourable, that could reinforce my confidence in this guarantee, or any statements from Kia that could sustain my trust in the recent acquisition of our Kia 4+ EV?
-
It possesses the RS500 wheels, does it not? I wish I still have a photograph of mine.
-
Concur. The E30 M3 S14 engine emitted a cacophony reminiscent of loose tools under high rpm, which were necessary to provide any kind of performance; I would unequivocally favour a straight-six engine, but the E30 M3 is aesthetically pleasing.
-
Similar to the vintage Sierra Sapphire Cosworths, those BMWs appear somewhat antiquated now. Neither option is appealing to me, regardless of the cost.
-
Weren't vintage automobiles reminiscent of goldfish bowls? The substantial dimensions of the windows, both front and rear screens. Nearly all of them (see images of those who did not) What did they weigh?
-
I would not have spent £4,500 for the white one, nor almost £6,000 for the red one. Additionally, I possessed another red one in Zinnober red, a convertible in dazzling red, and a black one as well.
-
While this is true, I would not invest £120,000 to return there.