All Activity

😉

Once it is repaired, you are familiar with the vehicle, hence I would retain it.

I have also found the drive to be excellent. It is now a dilemma whether to sell and obtain some cash or to utilise it until the engine dies. The Mini I possess, which is an enjoyable vehicle, is currently idle. BMW on weekdays, Mini on weekends. BM just pertains to the journey between work and home. I am not exerting any pressure; my son desires it, but he lacks the financial resources for necessary repairs. One often encounters the dilemma of either selling or purchasing another's issues, or retaining them due to familiarity with their resolution.

Somewhat unfortunate on your initial BMW experience. Do not be discouraged by this unfavourable beginning to ownership; if the car was inexpensive, it was so for a reason, and I believe you have uncovered those reasons. I have a 2007 3 series diesel auto that the lacquer has failed on roof and bonnet that i must sell but i have been saying that since April but it is such a reliable car i have done nothing to sell it just given it a run now i even insured it again recently but 3 cars is 1 too many lol. subsequently

Greetings to everyone. I have recently acquired a BMW, specifically a black 318i M Sport, aside from the BMW-manufactured Mini. It presents a striking appearance. Vehicle appears immaculate both externally and internally upon first observation. It has only been a week, and the differential has malfunctioned. A few days later, rear wheel bearings and rear brake discs. A week subsequent to that repair, the water pipe connecting the expansion bottle to the radiator failed.Fortunately, since the vehicle was immobile, there was no damage to the engine when the water depleted. The battery discharged while I awaited parts, necessitating the purchase of a jump starter battery. The engine light is illuminated, although the vehicle retains ample power and has not entered limp mode. The vehicle has accumulated 145,000 miles and has had six previous owners prior to my acquisition. Acquired it due to its affordability, although it may have resulted in an endless cycle of maintenance. it is a nice drive, the Auto transmission changes quite smoothly and the M sport feature works perfectly. The full leather seats, air conditioning, lowered sports suspension, and body package render it visually striking.

I possess the PHEV and regret not selecting the inline 6 instead. I have encountered no problems, except for a recall, but I do not consider the fuel efficiency to justify the trade-off regarding price and resale value. Prior to the expiration of the tax advantage, they offered absurd lease options for anyone wishing to experience the product before making a purchase. I am pleased to be merely leasing my. I appreciate the vehicle but would prefer to forgo the powerplant.

I cannot provide feedback on a PHEV CX90; but, I can attest that my MHEV (standard six-cylinder turbo) CX90 has performed flawlessly for 39,000 miles. The original tires remain, with a minimum of one additional maintenance period (10,000 miles) remaining. Only underwent standard maintenance and a few software updates for recall concerns that I did not encounter. My MHEV achieves between 26 and 30 miles per gallon on ordinary fuel and possesses sufficient acceleration to rapidly exceed legal speed limits.

I possess a 2024 Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV). I appreciate the car; yet, it presents an excessive number of issues. Maintain distance. I have taken mine to the shop over thirty times. Not worth the inconvenience. It is hoped that they will resolve issues as they progress.

I am exceedingly satisfied with the MHEV. Turbo S Performance Package

I purchased my 24 CX90 PHEV from a local Mazda dealer last December and am quite satisfied with it. The hybrid malfunction indicator illuminated a few days post-purchase. Returned it to the dealer, the issue was resolved, and no other problems have occurred.

I possess a 2024 CX-90 PHEV. We encountered initial issues mostly linked to software. The sole mechanical problem was the hot water heater. Mazda received a defective shipment from a supplier. For the past 1.5 years, it has been entirely devoid of issues. However, I comprehend your reluctance. Consumers are providing highly favourable reviews about the 2026 Toyota RAV4 PHEV.

I have a 2024. I adore it. Following the adjustment of the recall settings, she operates exceptionally well. I could not be more content.

I completely concur; I possessed a PHEV for two years and encountered recurrent Hybrid System and Engine Malfunction issues that intensified with the vehicle's age. This occurred twice when I initiated it in the dealership lot after the repairs were purportedly finished. Moreover, transitioning from an electric vehicle motor to an internal combustion engine may occasionally result in a jolt. This would continue to occur despite all the updates.

Subpar automobile. Refrain from purchasing. My vehicle was defective, and it appears that the flaws have yet to be resolved. While not all of them may be defective, numerous owners have claimed similar persistent problems. Despite its amazing interior and aesthetic appeal, the vehicle's inherent issues render ownership undesirable. Exquisite concept. Abysmal execution and engineering. Not prepared for public presentation.

Forego the PHEV variant; if your true desire is a plug-in hybrid, simply acquiesce and purchase a Lexus TX. I have owned my 2025 MHEV for 8 months and 8,000 miles without encountering any troubles thus far. It is a great vehicle, significantly superior to our 2019 CX-9 Signature, which we sold with 80,000 miles on it.

I am contemplating the purchase of a 2024 CX-90 PHEV in Artisan Red; however, initial year issues and general dependability apprehensions have significantly deterred me. While test driving a 2024 model with 19,000 miles in Houston, the vehicle displayed a hybrid system malfunction error before exiting the parking lot. Uninspiring. Furthermore, I do not earn a substantial income, and the prospect of expending $2,000 every 20,000 miles on tires is unappealing. I presently operate a 2016 CX-9 with more than 175,000 kilometres. I have solely performed routine maintenance. I anticipated that the new CX90 would provide comparable reliability, although I remain doubtful. I am uncertain whether Mazda has resolved the concerns with this vehicle. I wish to purchase this automobile. My heart affirms positively. My mind unequivocally rejects the notion. Indicate that I am incorrect.

From a specialist in alignment.... Is adhering to the road's camber customary? Indeed, it is typical for a vehicle to veer or "drift" marginally towards the lower side of a road's camber. This is attributable to the design of roadways for drainage, a characteristic referred to as road crown. Reasons for Vehicles Adhering to Camber Roads are deliberately constructed with a little curvature, known as a "crown," where the centre is the apex, facilitating water drainage towards the gutters. A vehicle inherently follows this incline due to gravitational forces and its alignment specifications. Normal Drift: On standard roadways, which are frequently sloped to the left for drainage in right-hand drive nations such as the UK, a vehicle will subtly veer in that direction. A slight, continual steering correction will be automatically implemented to maintain the car's straight trajectory without conscious thought. Differential Sensitivity: Certain vehicles exhibit greater sensitivity to road camber than others, influenced by elements such as suspension architecture, steering mechanism, tire dimensions, and alignment parameters (e.g., caster and toe). Adverse Camber: When navigating a road with an atypical or opposing camber (e.g., on the incorrect side of the roadway or an elevated curve), one will observe the vehicle veering in the opposite direction, indicating that the road's slope, rather than a defect in the vehicle, is the source of the issue. When to Express Concern A mild drift is typical; however, a strong, continuous, or exhausting drag indicates a potential problem that necessitates examination. A professional inspection of your vehicle is advisable if you encounter: A notable force exerted even on ostensibly level or opposing-cambered roads. Irregular or accelerated tyre degradation. A steering wheel that remains perpetually misaligned while driving straight on a flat road. The issue manifested abruptly following contact with a pothole or curb. A professional four-wheel alignment by an expert may guarantee that your vehicle's geometry adheres to the manufacturer's guidelines, thereby reducing the impact of road camber to a normal, manageable level.

Perhaps you could sell it to me when you upgrade! 👍

I must respectfully disagree: my prior vehicles have not exhibited this behaviour, and my current 5 Series steering scarcely registers road camber. Camber run-off is predominantly associated with extreme sports cars, which appears incongruous on a family vehicle, in my humble opinion.

Thank you for the engaging review. I possess a similar vehicle (2012 W204) equipped with the M276 3.5-liter petrol engine. The positive aspects align with your report, except the engine operates even more quietly throughout cruising; I conducted a direct comparison with the CDI before to purchasing the vehicle new. I possess the dynamic handling package, but I only use it while exerting maximum performance on rural roads, as the regular handling is already exceptional. I do not perceive the stock setup to be harsh at all with the 18-inch rims. Different tires may be required. I have utilised several various tires since acquiring the car new. The Pirelli All Season tires now fitted are exceptionally quiet. The comfort ventilated seats, as opposed to the normal sports seats, are exceptionally comfy. Regardless of the journey's duration. I have frequently driven over 300 miles continuously without a pause. Based on my frequent readings, I appear fortunate to not experience any squeaks or rattles within the vehicle. Alternatively, I may be experiencing hearing loss! I appreciate the dials, especially the well-integrated COMAND system for navigation, radio, and other functions, in contrast to the somewhat haphazard designs of older and later versions. Fuel usage appears comparable to that of the diesel variant. An indicated >40 mpg is typical throughout a journey, unless I am indulging in the power! However, during a one-mile winter journey to Tesco and back, it struggles to reach 20 mph. I have scarcely observed any camber sensitivity, both in the UK and in the five European countries where I have driven. I have operated numerous vehicles, hence I am aware of the poor quality of certain models. Aside from rare extreme cambers, I have never needed to exert more than a single finger on the steering wheel of the C350 to maintain a straight trajectory. I may have simply been fortunate with my current 13-year-old W204. I have not encountered anything I would prefer to substitute it with.

Appears somewhat harsh.I typically do not remove my hands from the steering wheel.However, if I drive on an A road, it will rapidly conform to the camber, however there is no discernible pull while my hands are on the wheel. On level motorways, the duration would be significantly extended. Gravity is insurmountable; any object in motion will inherently seek the route of least resistance (the slope) unless one exerts a modest upward steering force to counteract this tendency.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=bmw+5+series&_sacat=9801&_dmpt=Automobiles_UK&_odkw=&_osacat=9801&mkevt=1&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&campid=5338181132&toolid=10001&customid=2518X1570512Xf5dfb5ba64df728430779e8747395189&subId2=15

We must define 'typical camber runoff.' In the W204, if I release the steering wheel on a motorway with minimal road camber, it will veer into another lane within around two seconds. My BMW 5 Series maintains a steadfast trajectory when moving forward. On a more cambered road, such as a quality A road, the Mercedes may achieve a curb manoeuvre in approximately one second, whilst the BMW could take around ten seconds.

It is unfortunate that the camber issue has dissuaded you from the vehicle.I have operated several 204 models and have not experienced anything beyond the typical camber drift observed when releasing the steering wheel, which is common in most vehicles. I concur with your assessment of the engine; even in my heavier 212, it possesses ample power. The 540 Nm of torque at 1600-2400 rpm rivals that of significantly more powerful vehicles, and it is torque that is perceptible when accelerating, rather than horsepower. My vehicle has accumulated 100,000 miles. It produces an appealing sound when accelerated! I achieve marginally superior miles per gallon on the freeway (measured)...perhaps I own a lighter foot...or possibly the gearing on the E differs.

I would like to provide some input for prospective purchasers of the OM642-engined S204/W204. Favourable: Approaches the intermediate speed of a '55' AMG, sufficiently rapid for road use and enjoyable. Pleasant resonance from the subdued V6 engine. Not silent, but in comparison to the canal boat ambiance of the four-cylinder Mercedes engine, this was akin to the Silver Ghost standard. Exceptional chassis dynamics, navigates corners akin to a 3 Series. Favourable fuel efficiency for extended journeys at or below 70 mph, namely 38-40 mpg contingent on conditions (but consistently at least 10% more optimistic than the displayed readout). Mine had approximately 120,000 miles and was dependable during the 20,000 miles I owned it. Attractive vehicle despite its age. Compact dimensions, practical for transporting loads, yet easy to manoeuvre in parking situations. A 12-year-old Mercedes devoid of corrosion is remarkable! It was nearly ideal for my needs, except for the steering. For prospective purchasers: ensure that it does not have a persistent tendency to veer left consistently. Unsatisfactory: Severe design defect related to steering, which prompted my decision to sell it. It exhibited significant sensitivity to road camber. It veered left predominantly because to the leftward camber of the roadway, namely on the left side of the road crown. Consequently, while on holiday overseas, it veered to the right when driving on the right side of the road. On level ground, it did not exhibit pulling; hence, I do not consider this to be an alignment issue. I am not referring to a standard moderate drift; rather, this was an immediate and persistent pull to the left (or right when driving on the right). It infuriated me. Note Kindly refrain from directing me to the WheelsInMotion sticky topic. With with respect, it is illogical to adjust caster and camber to prevent a Mercedes from veering left, only to induce a rightward pull on level surfaces or during international driving. Particularly since the majority of vehicles do not require this 'oval racing' type of asymmetrical configuration. Furthermore, I had the wheel alignment performed at Micheldelver Protyre, which resulted in minimal improvement. Furthermore, I currently possess a BMW that consistently maintains a straight trajectory, regardless of the road's camber. Research indicates that this issue only affects W204 models from around 2012, while other models remain unaffected. Strange and bothersome (at least from my perspective - many on this site disagree). Had the alignment assessed at Micheldelver Protyre, who, after charging over £300 and adjusting the caster/camber to create a staggered configuration, stated, “all resolved now, sir.” I observed that it remained unfixed within a distance of 200 feet. I returned and remarked, “Excuse me, this is scarcely different from when I submitted it,” to which the mechanic replied, “They are all similar; very difficult to repair.” That information would have been more appropriately conveyed prior to the expenditure of over 300 pounds. Additionally, other minor grievances: Annoying little rattles and squeaks. I addressed most issues by the judicious application of anti-squeak tape and wedges, but the primary source of the buzzing sound was the seatbelt tensioner, which I remedied by inserting sponges beneath the trim. In my opinion, it is inappropriate to be making these repairs on a luxury vehicle. The dashboard gauges: Lexus gauges exemplify the ideal appearance for Mercedes gauges. In contrast, contemporary Mercedes vehicles appear as though the dials were conceived by Amstrad, characterised by geometric lines and excessive intricacy, lacking clarity and sophistication. My 40-mile round trip to the office during winter yielded 34 miles per gallon when driving with utmost caution, and perhaps 36-38 miles per gallon on extended journeys. The performance was satisfactory, but it warrants attention. Severe suspension and low-profile tires. It was aesthetically pleasing; nevertheless, on southern highways characterised by poor surfaces composed of small stones rather than gravel, it frequently proved uncomfortable and noisy. Indeed, I believe that tyre noise was a factor that detracted from its performance. The seats were neither uncomfortable nor exceptionally comfortable. The central dash illumination activated only at a certain period, rather than in conjunction with the headlights. If the day was overcast and the headlights were activated, the central dashboard would remain unilluminated. Unusual design defect. It is evident that, had it not been for the peculiar steering, this would have been a valuable acquisition. That is just unfortunate.