All Activity

Hey everyone, I’m on looking for a first car for my daughter's birthday and noticed a 2022 Fiat 500 on FB Marketplace posted by Lamsam Logistics. At first blush I thought I was dealing with a private seller, but it turns out I’ve stumbled upon a Belfast based transport company that’s also in the business of selling repossessed vehicles. They’ve thrown their hat in the ring with home delivery to Somerset, promising it’ll be on your doorstep in a week to ten days. That all sounds like pie in the sky but I’m feeling a bit like a cat on a hot tin roof about shelling out cash before laying my eyes on the car. Has anyone walked this road before? Or did you actually bite the bullet and buy from them? I’m all ears to get the lowdown on the process, payment, and vehicle details. Your thoughts would be worth their weight in gold.

With Windows, if the button makes a little movement when pushed, keep doing it until it's all the way up. Then, press and hold the down button until it's all the way down. After ten seconds, press and hold the up button again. Repeat this process until you've programmed the comfort settings.

Initially, I would reassemble the entire system, ensuring all connections are restored. I have observed that when moving a vehicle with the engine removed and connecting the battery, the wipers activate continuously, among other issues. After reassembly, if the vehicle is locked and allowed to enter sleep mode for five minutes, using the fob to unlock can resolve some problems. If this fails, I employ a diagnostic tool; I utilise a high-end Autel device that allows for the resetting of the ECU's short circuit protection via software. Additionally, once reassembled and after the sleep period, attempting to start the vehicle normally, then switching off and repeating this process several times can aid in restoring functionality. I am meticulous about disconnecting the battery on all vehicles I service, as incorrect voltage or wiring can cause significant damage. For resetting the FRM, I use Dtronix in Bristol, which also operates on eBay. If my suggestions do not yield results, the alternative is to send the FRM off for software repair.

Thank you. I was under the impression that it wasn't exhibiting all the common signs of FRM failure that are discussed on websites like YouTube. Since the vehicle is parked, I'll need to secure the driver's door window using tape. Once again, I am grateful.

After reassembling and connecting everything, I usually find that the wipers turn on whenever I need to move a car with the engine out and the battery connected. If that doesn't work, I try locking the car and letting it sleep for five minutes; then, using the key fob to open it should fix it. If that doesn't work, I turn to the diagnostics tool. If you have a high-end AUDEL, you may reset the short circuit protection in the software. After the battery is disconnected, turn the vehicle on normally, and then turn it back on again. This should help the ecu remember what it learns. I work on projects where the improper voltage or wiring might cause significant harm.

My sincere appreciation.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/str/precisionmotoring?mkevt=1&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&campid=5338767388&toolid=10001&customid=130832X1595941X6e8ed8b0a705b0d043af27e6a10bf0a0&subId2=15

You need a professional (not a do-it-yourselfer) to reset the footwell module. I hired precise garage, who sell on eBay; all you have to do is send them the FRM (forget the name).

Hello there! I just acquired a Mini One R56 1.4 petrol and, after reading some excellent tips from @Bitxx, began dismantling the engine in preparation for a refresh. However, I bungled the process and accidentally shorted the heat shield against the alternator connection. I have activated the wipers, but the electric windows won't turn off (there's a 2-inch gap on the driver's side 😱). Have I damaged a module? Would much appreciate any assistance. This vehicle has a backstory; we purchased it new for my wife in 2009 and sold it in 2015. The same woman had owned it until we repurchased it a few weeks ago!

😁😁😁

^^ They often "go walkabout" (often in the middle of the night)

Verify its continued presence.....

When this happens on my W205, it's typically because of the radar sensor or the wiring around it in the grill.

Hi there, It should be easy for you to replace the relay, which is located in the fuse box.

E350d Coupe C207 from 2016. Multiple instances of the warning "Collision prevention assist plus inoperative" have occurred; after scanning the vehicle with iCarsoft, the error code B21DE71 was returned. Due to a clogged actuator and a faulty relay, the Additional Battery is not functioning properly. After I reset it, it keeps popping back up at random. I will verify it, but the primary battery seems to be in fine shape. The auxiliary battery, on the other hand, was replaced with a real one around three years ago. I saw the notice "Auxiliary battery malfunction" the last time the backup battery stopped working. Using Google and the extra battery relay, we were able to locate the component number A0009822023. I need to know whether the auxiliary battery is okay, where to find the relay, and if they are a direct swap. Does the A0009822023 relay work with all Mercedes models? I've seen ads for ones that seem to be model-specific. Is anybody else familiar with this issue? Much obliged.

Certainly, the first Kia customer care agents were appalling. They claimed that a few stamps in a book weren't sufficient and that I should have a thorough service record, claiming that my guarantee was null and invalid. They were told that the Kia repair shop had never repaired the car. In all candour, they're really a swarm of serpents. Someone from the CEO's staff got in touch with me after studying the letter I submitted to inform me that the warranty was still valid, but only in circumstances where the flaw was the result of a manufacturing mistake.

Sure, the first Kia customer service representatives were horrible. They said my warranty was null and void and that I should get a comprehensive service record; they insisted that a few stamps in a book did not enough. The Kia repair shop they dealt with denied ever having rebuilt the vehicle. To be honest, they're just a group of serpents. I sent a letter to the CEO of the company, and after reviewing it, someone from his team contacted to tell me that the warranty was still in effect, but only in cases where the defect was due to a manufacturing error.

What a hardship. If your dealership has denied rebuilding the engine, it is dishonest. At such a low mileage, why was a rebuild necessary? Was it proper to rebuild? The conrods failed, therefore I was wondering if there was a problem that required the rebuild. If Kia knew anything was wrong, they wouldn't have sold an almost new vehicle to another garage instead of a customer. Have you contacted Kia's customer service department to enquire about their perspective?

Your response is really appreciated. Thanks to my extensive research and the identification of the vehicle's former owner, Kia has approved the vehicle's service history. Telling the garage workers to "shove it," he returned it to them. They agreed to take it, but he had to make a deal to purchase another vehicle from them. However, in order for Kia to cover the costs of a new engine and inspection in the event of a manufacturing defect, the vehicle must still undergo an examination by a Kia garage, even if Kia has acknowledged the service history and said that the warranty is valid. The oil, air filters, and vehicle were serviced three weeks prior to this. The car needed the right oil. A large amount of oil is still dispersed around my driveway! I am now in that position. The dealership isn't someone I trust to do the inspection, to be honest. Their allegiance will remain with Kia. However, I am completely stranded.

My heart goes out to you since the situation you've described is so terrible. Without repeating what you've already said, I can only remark that your research into the car's past has left me curious about the care and driving habits of its prior owner(s). In the end, a KIA dealership inspection is required before a decision on the overall cost of engine rebuilding (or replacing the engine entirely) can be reached. It will be costly anyway, but KIA could consider providing financial aid, though they are under no obligation to do so. The risk of going to unofficial, less expensive garages rather than KIA dealerships has been brought up before forum members previously. I'm going to assume that KIA does not recognise the validity of service book stamps as proof that maintenance has been carried out according to their standards, given what you have said. If it turns out that the automobile has been serviced at a KIA dealer, then KIA UK needs to step in and take responsibility, working with their designated dealer, to resolve the issue. However, between maintenance, it is still the responsibility of the owner or driver to monitor the oil and fluid levels. As many of you who are frequent readers of this site are probably aware, there are some owners who, in between servicing, never even check beneath the hood, save to fill up the windscreen washer fluid tank. I hope everything works out well for you in the end.

I fear you could be right, unfortunately. Getting here has been no picnic. There will be a more formidable opponent waiting for me. They probably won't topple over, and I agree with you. I've already gotten the prior owner on board and made it plain that I'm willing to go to court, so... I am not going down without a struggle, and I intend to make a stink about it!

After reading your comment, I feel that you should clarify exactly what Kia is selling. Apparently, Kia said, "This will be covered by the warranty IF it is found to be a manufacturing fault." Your suggestion that it should state "if it is found to be a rebuild fault" is incorrect. It's a matter of semantics and subtlety, but if Kia would only pay for faulty components made by the manufacturer, they will probably try to avoid paying for rebuild errors and will instead pass the expense on to their franchisee. No way a franchisee would be able to pay for a new engine without fighting.

I'll admit it: this is the main reason franchises hurt manufacturers. Everything was done at the same garage, who flat-out denied any involvement. The documentation from a prior owner, nevertheless, was located by me.Which Kia dealership was that garage?

I paid sixteen grand for my Sportage on January 3, 2025. The mileage was 28,00. In early November, I had a service cone, during which the oil, air, and filter were replaced. From time to time, I detected what I assumed to be an engine/exhaust odour. Up until the conrod broke catastrophically on November 23, 2025, I was satisfied with it. After a tremendous crash, my speed dropped, and oil spurted out in all directions on a heavily used dual road. I had to pay extra to have the vehicle hauled to a nearby kia dealership and then lease a new vehicle. "Your service book will not be accepted by Kia unless you have your invoices and receipts," the garage promptly said. It is most likely that the con rod broke due to an absence of lubrication. There is no documentation of service with the stamps, according to Kia. Receipts, etc., are required. As a result, I learnt that the vehicle had its engine rebuilt at 12,000 miles. Engine was serviced at 22,000 miles and suspension at 27,500. Everything was done at the same garage, who flat-out denied any involvement. The documentation from a prior owner, nevertheless, was located by me. The garage where I purchased it was located only around the corner from the one that sold it (the Kia dealership). "It seems you do have a warranty," KIA is now stating. Okay. If a comprehensive diagnostic is performed by a kia shop, they will replace the engine at no cost to you. This will set you back £782. If it turns out to be a defect in production, the warranty will pay for it. Of course, prejudice worries me. I'm wondering whether the engine rebuild will be acknowledged as the possible cause. In addition to the £782 I have spent on the first 4,000 kilometres, the cost of a new engine is £5-6,000. Listen, I'm ill, you guys. It ruined our Christmas and now I'm terrified someone will have a grudge against me. Even while the ombudsman and trade standards are on board, this won't solve the problem anytime soon. Does anybody else have experience with this or have any suggestions to offer?

There's enough smoke to make you wonder if anything is wrong, but the dealer insists it's normal. They've already promised to return the vehicle to them if it passes inspection as sound and problem-free, adding they're tired with choices and have tried everything. I suspect they are attempting to avoid doing any more repair or diagnostics on it since it was returned to them weeks into ownership over worries about smoking under warranty. Originally, the warranty was for three months, but I believe I am protected under the Consumer Rights Act — In the event that a problem is reported within the warranty term and the repairs are unsuccessful or take too long, the warranty will often continue to cover that particular, continuing issue. This is to prevent recurring faults. "One Shot" at Repair: The Consumer Rights Act states that if a seller fails to fix or replace a defective car, the buyer has one chance. It makes no difference whether the warranty has already expired; if the repair doesn't work, you may be able to get your money back or have your car rejected. It has been about ten months since I purchased the automobile, give or take a little. The problem was detected rather quickly—within a few weeks—but the garage has been giving conflicting reports and has been throwing parts at the problem without really fixing it.