I am considering disposing of my 2005 CLK 320.

[Workerat]

I purchased a CLK320 over 3 years ago, but it has developed many problems. Unfortunately, I am considering scrapping it, which is rather disheartening. I am writing this to seek reassurance and confirmation.

The vehicle has had many electrical issues and, unsurprisingly, there is a significant amount of rust on the rear passenger quarter. There is water entering the trunk (causing unpleasant odours in the carpeting) and a malfunctioning seatbelt.

Recently, my vehicle experienced a flat tyre. I attempted to remove the wheel on the side of the road using hand tools, but was unsuccessful due to the lock nut not providing enough grip. Prior to the flat tyre, there was significant noise coming from that particular corner. Initially, I believed the noise was caused by the corrosion of the tin baking plate, which had been temporarily repaired approximately two years ago. However, I now suspect that the noise and the flat tyre may be unrelated a

The identified electrical problems include the absence of a horn, intermittent functioning of the o2 engine fan, occasional failures of the windows to close properly, and warning messages related to the ESP sensors prompting the need for a service visit. To be honest, I believe that all electrical problems are either caused by water entering the system (which I suspect is due to extensive corrosion) or a malfunctioning steering column module. However, it is difficult to determine the exact cause without investing a significant amount of money in a thorough examination.

It seems that I have limited alternatives unless I invest a significant amount of resources. Do you have any comments or advice that I should consider before I make the call?

[baelicious]

I really dislike giving up on automobiles, but I would in this particular case. It is possible that you may incur more expenses by repairing it compared to purchasing a new one. In my opinion.

 

[AmericaMonster]

What is the age and mileage?However, that does not sound favourable.

[Workerat]

The vehicle was constructed in 2004 and officially registered in 2005. It has accumulated around 120,000 kilometres.

Yes, I believe it is time for the unavoidable. I like the engine in it as well, and it's unfortunate that it likely has another 500,000 miles of life left.

[AmericaMonster]

Unfortunately, my 2002 CLK200k was in impeccable condition, free from corrosion, and had no faults when I sold it at about 160,000 miles. However, it seems that it is no longer registered with the DVLA.

[Workerat]

Oh, that's great as well!

The condition of my vehicle's exterior is impressive, to be honest. People are amazed that it still looks good after over 20 years, particularly considering the unchanged interior. However, the back subframe and everything below it, including the components, are in poor condition, which is rather concerning.

[Grundysp]

It seems to be an opportune moment to progress.

It seems that the automobile has been neglected, and unless you are capable of doing the repairs yourself, it would not be financially viable to spend money on fixing it.

What alternative would you purchase, though? 🙂

[Boxck]

There is a significant advantage in sticking with a familiar automobile, even if it has certain flaws. For instance, owning a 2005 model CLK exempts you from the exorbitant RFL tax that was implemented in April 2006 and has lately increased to nearly £700 per year.