AmericaMonster

I anticipate he will encounter difficulties in achieving his asking price because to the gearbox issue.

https://www.facebook.com/login/?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fmarketplace%2Fitem%2F2325342897983187

These are rather inexpensive in the US; I have located a reliable rust-free model nearby that includes air conditioning but need a gearbox replacement.

Components are also in action for me (before, I possessed a vehicle that required less maintenance) 😎

Indeed, it has been dismantled; the vehicle is currently in numerous components at the local Mercedes-Benz specialist. My version corresponds to the original photograph I shared, featuring the pipes positioned forward, rather than the others I have encountered widely, unfortunately.

Greetings, Thank you for the research conducted there. Interestingly, you have identified the identical issue I encountered; however, the complication is in the pipes. Reorient the object to match the initial image I shared, ensuring the ringed section is positioned identically, and you will observe that the pipes extend from the rear rather than the front, as depicted in my illustration. I can easily locate the left-hand drive version, but the right-hand drive variant is proving to be somewhat elusive. The part number you possess corresponds with the Mercedes part lookup; yet, any attempt to locate it results in the pipes being orientated incorrectly. It resembles a hybrid mutt!

Greetings, Indeed, I have already explored r129.co.uk; but, there is no information available for the C140 or W140 models. It appears that the components are same, however the part numbers differ. Preferably, I would choose for a new component, as I have encountered reports indicating that they are prone to failure. The cost and inconvenience associated with disassembling the vehicle to install a used part appears somewhat irrational, given the likelihood of a recurrence occurring sooner than with a fresh replacement. It is exceedingly annoying that all the new models available appear to be for left-hand drive, despite claims of being right-hand drive.

Hello, WDB1400632A426327

All the models I have located, including the purchased one, include the pipes on the left side orientated towards the rear, rather than the front. I possess part numbers A1408300358, A1408301558, and A1408302258, which are purportedly accurate; yet, all of them appear to yield LHD options once more. Does anyone have suggestions on potential sources? I presently possess a CL420 disassembled into over 1,000 components at my local Mercedes-Benz specialist awaiting installation. I prefer new items, but not at exorbitant prices. Numerous new non-Mercedes options are available for under £200; nevertheless, they all feature pipes orientated incorrectly. There may be one available at Mercedes in Germany for £700 plus VAT. If I cannot identify a more rational alternative, I may have to reluctantly proceed with that option, though I remain hopeful for another possibility. Thank you in advance for any guidance.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_nkw=ac evaporator&_sacat=0&_dmpt=Computing_ComputerComponents_Fans_Heatsinks_SR&_odkw=arctic cooling freezer 64 pro&_osacat=0&_trksid=p3286.c0.m270.l1313&mkevt=1&mkcid=1&mkrid=710-53481-19255-0&campid=5338181132&toolid=10001&customid=2518X1570512Xe3257b07ec62c890aea27d2e08070f1f&subId2=15

Greetings everyone, I am seeking an AC evaporator for a 1998 C140. Mine has malfunctioned and is leaking, unfortunately. I ordered one from Autodoc, however upon arrival, although being designated for a right-hand drive vehicle, it was intended for a left-hand drive. I have seen several new options online; however, upon closer examination, they all seem to be designed for left-hand drive vehicles. I require one of these (not the one I photographed, and disregard the red ring)...

I sold mine on eBay for £115 and acquired a Topdon ArtDiag900, which is vastly superior in all aspects.

Significant issues with disc thickness variation and judder may arise if the vehicle is stationary with damp brakes, frequently following cleaning. Moist pads leave an indelible mark on the disc that cannot be eradicated. Merely a consideration to raise awareness.

From a specialist in alignment.... Is adhering to the road's camber customary? Indeed, it is typical for a vehicle to veer or "drift" marginally towards the lower side of a road's camber. This is attributable to the design of roadways for drainage, a characteristic referred to as road crown. Reasons for Vehicles Adhering to Camber Roads are deliberately constructed with a little curvature, known as a "crown," where the centre is the apex, facilitating water drainage towards the gutters. A vehicle inherently follows this incline due to gravitational forces and its alignment specifications. Normal Drift: On standard roadways, which are frequently sloped to the left for drainage in right-hand drive nations such as the UK, a vehicle will subtly veer in that direction. A slight, continual steering correction will be automatically implemented to maintain the car's straight trajectory without conscious thought. Differential Sensitivity: Certain vehicles exhibit greater sensitivity to road camber than others, influenced by elements such as suspension architecture, steering mechanism, tire dimensions, and alignment parameters (e.g., caster and toe). Adverse Camber: When navigating a road with an atypical or opposing camber (e.g., on the incorrect side of the roadway or an elevated curve), one will observe the vehicle veering in the opposite direction, indicating that the road's slope, rather than a defect in the vehicle, is the source of the issue. When to Express Concern A mild drift is typical; however, a strong, continuous, or exhausting drag indicates a potential problem that necessitates examination. A professional inspection of your vehicle is advisable if you encounter: A notable force exerted even on ostensibly level or opposing-cambered roads. Irregular or accelerated tyre degradation. A steering wheel that remains perpetually misaligned while driving straight on a flat road. The issue manifested abruptly following contact with a pothole or curb. A professional four-wheel alignment by an expert may guarantee that your vehicle's geometry adheres to the manufacturer's guidelines, thereby reducing the impact of road camber to a normal, manageable level.

Appears somewhat harsh.I typically do not remove my hands from the steering wheel.However, if I drive on an A road, it will rapidly conform to the camber, however there is no discernible pull while my hands are on the wheel. On level motorways, the duration would be significantly extended. Gravity is insurmountable; any object in motion will inherently seek the route of least resistance (the slope) unless one exerts a modest upward steering force to counteract this tendency.

It is unfortunate that the camber issue has dissuaded you from the vehicle.I have operated several 204 models and have not experienced anything beyond the typical camber drift observed when releasing the steering wheel, which is common in most vehicles. I concur with your assessment of the engine; even in my heavier 212, it possesses ample power. The 540 Nm of torque at 1600-2400 rpm rivals that of significantly more powerful vehicles, and it is torque that is perceptible when accelerating, rather than horsepower. My vehicle has accumulated 100,000 miles. It produces an appealing sound when accelerated! I achieve marginally superior miles per gallon on the freeway (measured)...perhaps I own a lighter foot...or possibly the gearing on the E differs.

https://www.carandclassic.com/car/C1963173

The optimal season to consider a convertible, as opposed to Easter. Evaluate Investing somewhat more in a well-maintained, fully functional example devoid of rust, as opposed to opting for a less expensive option requiring over £1,000 in repairs, servicing, brakes, tires, suspension, etc. Within one to two years, you would achieve a break-even point. The SLK will be the less pragmatic yet more enjoyable choice, having owned and now owning both. A V6 is appealing, but a four-cylinder engine serves as a sufficient entry-level option; nonetheless, both options are not economical in terms of operation and taxation. Regrettably, I must assert that an MX5, provided it is free from rust, ought to be included in your list of potential purchases. The burgundy SLK appears aesthetically pleasing. Pragmatic wheels for our thoroughfares. However, while you may experience diminished possibility for regret, your initial budget may need to be augmented. Although there are options with greater distance to consider Enhance advertisements to facilitate improved commentary on the forum. Only a singular thought. The R171 SLKs lack spaciousness for taller individuals, such as yourself or your spouse, however this is typical for most two-seaters. Additionally, it is advisable to avoid the diesel variant.

Simultaneous oversteer and understeer? Is it not more accurately described as moving laterally?

I will send images tomorrow morning. The rear is now lowered; however, they cannot level it with the front due to the absence of the front lowering links, which prevents calibration. One side of the front is elevated compared to the other, and I am uncertain of the reason, since HR springs are placed at the front. During my last experience, I transitioned from comfort mode to sport mode, resulting in the rear suspension losing its reduced characteristics, which I was unable to restore, prompting me to return to the shop. They lowered it again but indicated that it would not remain in that position.

I saw them; the only difficulty is that it requires a 40-minute journey. However, I believe it would be prudent to avoid engaging with this triviality.

I need to do more study; also, I have already acquired and installed the links.

Indeed, it is a valid observation; I am now in Bristol.

Indeed, I purchased the item, and it is already fitted; nevertheless, it has not been lowered.

Precisely what I anticipated, and are they only for the rear? I now have adjustable lowering links fitted at the rear.