All Activity

I have not had to change any batteries thus far. The pouch is adequately enough to accommodate the fob and a small Yale-type home key.

Thank you for the information and the link. That is enough inexpensive to warrant experimentation. The key ring must be sufficiently large to accommodate the house keys. Another rationale for acquiring one is to deactivate the signal it sends, as it will reduce battery longevity. Have you replaced the battery in the key yet?

PS...I did not provide you with a private link. Unusual...

The vehicle is stationed in my driveway overnight, and I am indeed satisfied with the security.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Lanpard-Faraday-Securing-Keyring-Blocking/dp/B08FT6YCQZ/ref=ast_sto_dp_puis?th=1&_encoding=UTF8&tag=hondacivicforumuk-sl-21

It is a Lanpard tiny pouch purchased from Amazon, now priced at $9.99 for two pouches.

Purchased from Amazon or the individual associated with the private link you provided? Additional information would be beneficial. There appears to be minimal interest in these. Are you all content that your vehicles are safely parked on your driveway or the street?

I possess an inexpensive small pouch that appears to function adequately with my 23 Advance.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B073JNWH83?linkCode=osi&th=1&psc=1&ascsubtag=ecSEPlmocvjmi36ej6v&_encoding=UTF8&tag=hondacivicforumuk-sl-21

https://www.bestproductsreviews.co.uk/faraday pouch for car keys?targetid=kwd-373504015141&matchtype=b&device=c&campaignid=22373102577&creative=741916751446&adgroupid=175774224134&feeditemid=&loc_physical_ms=1006620&loc_interest_ms=&network=g&devicemodel=&placement=&keyword=$faraday pouch for car keys&target=&aceid=&adposition=&trackid=uk_all_top_11_2&mId=407-132-4411&trackOld=true&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22373102577&gbraid=0AAAAACWZmZk1uSk30Yw_pYd9YEqfeSsT4&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIkcC2lKT5kAMVc6hQBh1uCwvoEAAYAiAAEgKDs_D_BwE

A BBC News story detailed how burglars appropriated a vehicle from an individual's driveway by scanning for the keyless fob within the residence. My vehicle is stored in a garage, thereby ensuring its security; but, placing the key in a Faraday pouch will deactivate the signal after a few minutes. This will significantly prolong its lifespan. Here is a compilation of the most endorsed. I am contemplating this option, however is it excessive given that a comparable Amazon alternative is available for much less?

It would merely be conjecture on my part; you should consult a somebody proficient in Xentry for assistance.

The identical issue as this individual, although he has not responded with a solution.

Thank you for your response. The water was certainly not deep enough to reach the inlet, therefore I am 99% confident that it is not hydrolocked. The ECU in these vehicles is located underneath and may have had water damage or have compromised wiring beneath it.

It appears to have lost communication with the engine ECU. Unless you encountered floodwater enough deep to cause hydrolock in the engine....

Greetings to all. I am enquiring if anyone is able to assist me. I possess a 2017 Mercedes C63S, and the other evening, under inclement weather, I undertook a two-hour journey. After traversing several shallow rain puddles, I suddenly saw a red battery warning on my dashboard, accompanied by a significant decrease in vehicle power as I entered the freeway. I drive over to the side and turn off the truck. The vehicle failed to initiate or start once more. Upon returning home and recovering, I charged the battery, but it has made no impact. All the lights and other components appear to be functioning properly, yet the engine fails to start. I am seeing several warnings on the dashboard. Traction control nonfunctional, electronic rear axle differential lock inoperative, etc. I conducted a cursory examination and obtained several codes. U010031 There is a fault in the communication with the "combustion engine" control unit. The signal is absent. U010029 indicates a problem in communication with the "combustion engine" control unit. An incorrect signal exists. Has anyone experienced something analogous? Assistance is valued.

N53.

The 3.0i was marketed as the 25i and 30i. Identical engine, although configured differently at the factory and equipped with a distinct intake manifold. The N52 utilised port injection and was regarded as highly reliable; nevertheless, it is ageing and requires numerous component replacements. The N53 was BMW's first direct injection engine and represented a significant advancement. Concerns include the NOx sensor, NOx catalytic converter, injectors, and high-pressure fuel pump. These are notorious for malfunctioning, and the repair costs can be substantial. I have observed individuals acquiring discount N53 vehicles, only to later lament on forums about engine misfiring, with mechanics stating that six new injectors are required. Conduct extensive research prior to making a purchase.

I am examining the 3.0 version.

I believed the N53 was exclusively offered in 25i and 30i variants. Both engines possess advantages and disadvantages.

According to the VIN decoder, it is a N53. Is that advantageous or disadvantageous?

Thank you, I will obtain the VIN and provide an update.

The European market variant of the vehicle was equipped with the N53B30 engine, whereas the Asian market variant used the N52B25. However, I would recommend verifying the VIN.

It may be either n52 or n53; therefore, it is advisable to proceed as indicated and verify using the VIN number.

https://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/select