All Activity

The release bearing is damaged. The subsequent procedure involves seizing and perforating the clutch cover. You must remove the gearbox and replace the clutch. Relatively simple to manage them, even when positioned on axle stands. A new clutch costs approximately £120 for a four-cylinder non-air conditioning model (solid flywheel) and somewhat more for a 328i variant. Adhere to reputable brands such as LuK or Sachs. Typically, the 316i/318i/318is models from that year equipped with air conditioning use a twin mass flywheel.

It would be prudent to install a new clutch concurrently, as it entails the same level of effort.

https://www.realoem.com/bmw/enUS/partxref?id=CB33-USA-06-1995-E36-BMW-325i&mg=21&sg=05&diagId=21_0292&q=21517521471&series=E36

Are you aware of the part number? I will attempt to rectify it.

The issue may likely be the thrust bearing, which can become loud yet function effectively for many years.

However, the noise originates in the gearbox, caused by friction during rotation.

I would examine the number 4 bushings or the springs.

I possess a 1995 E36 with a manual 5-speed transmission, and I am experiencing a noise when depressing the clutch pedal. What is the method to resolve this issue? Is it merely a bearing replacement?

A participant in the new member sticky indicated that the engines are somewhat noisy and that what I am characterising as a "knock" is probably only a standard "tick". I am currently performing an ECM reset and relearn, will manually compute the mileage, and will apply a fuel system cleaning. I will respond with the results. Excellent suggestions, thank you!

https://www.google.com/search?q=ECM+(Engine+Control+Module)&client=safari&sca_esv=92debb9001157326&channel=mac_bm&source=hp&ei=vQABafXyAav1kPIPpMqOkQ8&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaQEOzZtQQQW1YhcC2kZX9hTEKkDuj7LL&oq=2023+camry%2C+how+do+I+reset+the+ecm+and+do+a+rel&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6Ii8yMDIzIGNhbXJ5LCBob3cgZG8gSSByZXNldCB0aGUgZWNtIGFuZCBkbyBhIHJlbCoCCAAyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUiTmQFQAFjVenAAeACQAQCYAW-gAaweqgEENDMuNLgBAcgBAPgBAZgCL6ACzSDCAgsQABiABBiKBRiRAsICDhAuGIAEGLEDGMcBGNEDwgIOEAAYgAQYigUYsQMYgwHCAggQLhiABBixA8ICCxAAGIAEGLEDGIMBwgILEC4YgAQYsQMYgwHCAg4QLhiABBiKBRixAxiDAcICBRAAGIAEwgIKEC4YgAQYigUYQ8ICCBAAGIAEGLEDwgIKEAAYgAQYigUYQ8ICDRAuGIAEGIoFGEMYsQPCAgQQABgDwgIIEC4YsQMYgATCAgUQLhiABMICBxAAGIAEGArCAgYQABgWGB7CAgsQABiABBiKBRiGA8ICCBAAGIkFGKIEwgIFEAAY7wXCAggQABiABBiiBMICBRAhGJ8FwgIFECEYqwKYAwCSBwQ0MS42oAfQ8AKyBwQ0MS42uAfNIMIHCTAuMTAuMzYuMcgHuwE&sclient=gws-wiz&mstk=AUtExfAqathgzG1Xxtms_zVKmWYsF57GP-4Uw0sASgQP7NdcvXTv82qgc-hHMwn2FJTktR3YQC2uWhLYdZWpoVS8uThkGRbwWhJ04cHBJ4JmundhdXRgYAZ4aXahQR67jFk7N5A&csui=3&ved=2ahUKEwi8ocv2uMeQAxWYiI4IHdXIFekQgK4QegQIARAB

If a code and knock were present, I would assume a potential timing issue that the ECM cannot adequately adjust the air/fuel ratio for, possibly indicating a faulty knock sensor. However, that remains mere conjecture at this juncture. I am considering resetting the ECM to enable it to recalibrate based on your driving behaviour. To reset the ECM on a 2023 Camry, detach the battery for a minimum of 10 minutes, then reattach it. Upon reconnection, set the ignition to the "on" position for 1-2 minutes, initiate the engine, allow it to idle for approximately 10 minutes, and thereafter execute a drive cycle encompassing both city and highway speeds to enable the vehicle to recalibrate its parameters.

I utilised the vehicle's trip computer for monitoring miles per gallon. I have not engaged in traditional mathematics, but you are correct; I ought to do so. My scanner is rudimentary, but I am in the process of updating. It produces an unpleasant noise upon cold start, characterised by a rhythmic knock, possibly originating from a specific cylinder, and I believe I can detect a subtle rhythmic sound or knock during warm idle. However, I am unfamiliar with the vehicle and cannot ascertain if it is its typical sound. Ought I should publish or share a video? We have possessed it for merely 10 days; however, it appears to operate adequately, save from the knock, which may not necessarily be problematic. The driver's side visor detached, but it is easily repairable. 43,000 miles. Two proprietors. Delivered to the dealership for routine maintenance. No active or pending codes exist. Thank you for your response!

Are you utilising the vehicle's system for the MPG figures or employing traditional calculations? Do you possess a scanner capable of reading live data? Understanding the fuel trims, for instance, could be advantageous. In addition to the fuel efficiency, how does it perform in terms of operation and handling? What is the mileage, and are you aware of the maintenance history of the vehicle? I assume the Check Engine Light is off, signifying that no diagnostic codes are present?

We recently purchased a 2023 Camry XLE (4-cylinder, front-wheel drive), and the fuel efficiency is far lower than claimed. We are achieving 32 miles per gallon on the highway and 19-23 in urban driving, compared to the quoted figures of 27/38. I am really apprehensive on this matter, as the mileage and economy of the V6/SUV were primary factors in our decision to select a 4-cylinder front-wheel-drive model. The tires are little larger than specified (235/45 R19 instead of R18), but I have read that this should have a minimal impact on fuel efficiency. I possess mechanical aptitude and am aware of the necessity to inspect fundamental components (oil, air filter, MAF sensor, diagnostic codes, tyre pressure); no apparent faults are present. The dealer replaced the oil and installed new tires prior to the sale. All counsel is appreciated. I do not observe any fuel efficiency concerns about these vehicles when I conduct online research. I am concerned that we have purchased a defective product.

🫡

Your mileage is minimal, so you are likely in good condition; may you encounter no issues in the future!

I have encountered no problems!

🫡

Is that the model known for frequent CVT failures?

If I recall correctly, the US market C-HR is equipped with a 2-liter 3ZR-FAE engine paired with a CVT, a configuration not utilised elsewhere globally.

Somewhat, certainly, but it is precisely all I require. The RAV4 was excellent. Our daughter currently possesses it, and it has over 100,000 miles.

Somewhat, certainly, but it is precisely all I require. The 2015 Rav4 was undoubtedly excellent. Our daughter now possesses it, and it has exceeded 100,000 on it!

That sounds excellent; but, downsizing from the RAV4 must be challenging, as the C-HR appears far smaller.

Greetings, Following my Rav-4, and uncertain of my preferences, I encountered this vehicle on the lot, and it was an immediate attraction! While I would prefer a BMW roadster in this colour, a retired teacher's salary does not permit such a purchase. I have owned the C-HR for six years and have much appreciated it. I undoubtedly depend on my phone for GPS navigation. Nonetheless, it is the ideal size for me (My 6'1" husband is not really fond of it, but he is content that I am pleased.) The driving and ride are seamless; it has ample space in the rear for gardening and antiquing equipment; the fabric seats are comfy; and it achieves excellent fuel efficiency. I appreciate the door knobs for the rear seats! I possess only 25,000 miles on it and aspire not to get another vehicle, until the BMW materialises.