All Activity

🫡

Your mileage is minimal, so you are likely in good condition; may you encounter no issues in the future!

I have encountered no problems!

🫡

Is that the model known for frequent CVT failures?

If I recall correctly, the US market C-HR is equipped with a 2-liter 3ZR-FAE engine paired with a CVT, a configuration not utilised elsewhere globally.

Somewhat, certainly, but it is precisely all I require. The RAV4 was excellent. Our daughter currently possesses it, and it has over 100,000 miles.

Somewhat, certainly, but it is precisely all I require. The 2015 Rav4 was undoubtedly excellent. Our daughter now possesses it, and it has exceeded 100,000 on it!

That sounds excellent; but, downsizing from the RAV4 must be challenging, as the C-HR appears far smaller.

Greetings, Following my Rav-4, and uncertain of my preferences, I encountered this vehicle on the lot, and it was an immediate attraction! While I would prefer a BMW roadster in this colour, a retired teacher's salary does not permit such a purchase. I have owned the C-HR for six years and have much appreciated it. I undoubtedly depend on my phone for GPS navigation. Nonetheless, it is the ideal size for me (My 6'1" husband is not really fond of it, but he is content that I am pleased.) The driving and ride are seamless; it has ample space in the rear for gardening and antiquing equipment; the fabric seats are comfy; and it achieves excellent fuel efficiency. I appreciate the door knobs for the rear seats! I possess only 25,000 miles on it and aspire not to get another vehicle, until the BMW materialises.

I concur; high mileage is subjective and may encompass anything up to 250,000 miles, I presume. The service history is crucial; after you identify a desired vehicle, obtain the VIN and contact BMW support. They will provide you with the servicing details via email, allowing you to verify if it corresponds with the iDrive records. Indeed, servicing nine times out of ten is crucial; nevertheless, the issue lies in BMW's imprudent extended mileage oil intervals, which may be acceptable for the initial years but are suboptimal. Consequently, even with 100,000 miles on the odometer, individuals erroneously believe that changing the oil every 13,000 to 18,000 miles is adequate. If an individual has performed the servicing themselves, there may be concerns regarding their use of appropriate oil or opting for inferior products from discount retailers, necessitating the examination of invoices.

What is regarded as high mileage for the N57 engine? Can most issues be prevented by regular maintenance? I intend to acquire an asset valued at approximately 60,000 and likely sell it in a few years when it reaches 100,000. Is the 57 engine unreliable, or is it merely more susceptible to problems than the 47? Thank you

Both vehicles are commendable. The 420d is the more economical option for operational expenses, while the 430d offers somewhat enhanced performance; nonetheless, it is not significantly powerful. Locating a 420d that has been customised by an owner or searching online for a 420d Individual will provide you with the desired vehicle and greater reassurance compared to the troubles seen by the 30d at elevated mileage.

Thank you for the information; I was unaware that they transitioned to LEDs in late 2017.

My driving primarily involves short excursions, such as dropping off at the station and trips to the grocery, both of which are less than a mile away. I primarily work from home, and when I commute to the office, it is merely a 15-minute journey. I am not the most qualified individual to provide fuel economy statistics. I operate a 2.0i BMW not for enjoyment, but owing to its significantly lower operating costs compared to a Ford Mondeo, as I perform most of the maintenance and repairs myself. If you seek a 2017-18 model, I recommend selecting a late 2017 variant. The headlight was upgraded from Xenon to LED. A cursory observation may not reveal the distinction, but the giveaway is that the Xenon features a diamond-shaped headlamp wash cover on the bumper, whilst the LED does not.

How do you determine the fuel efficiency of the 420i? I contemplated acquiring it, but the majority of reviews indicate that they are largely comparable, with the diesel variant offering slightly more power and around double the fuel efficiency. I am now inclined towards the 6.

I currently possess a 420i, however I have been provided with a 420d six-speed manual loan vehicle for two weeks while my previous E92 is being fixed by the insurance company. I remember driving the 420d, which had considerable torque, and I certainly tested the car at every red light. That was my first experience driving a diesel vehicle, which differed significantly from driving a petrol one. If you seek a vehicle for commuting and daily use with little operating expenses, the 420d is suitable; it is unremarkable compared to my 420i but offers slightly more torque. However, if you desire enhanced performance, consider the six-cylinder option. I would personally refrain from opting for X-drive unless absolutely necessary, as it introduces a another potential failure point as the vehicle ages. There are already several concerns associated with an older BMW.

Indeed, it aligns with my understanding of the xDrive; hence, I will certainly opt for the standard option. Thank you!

Avoid non-X drives; they exhibit several issues and are subpar overall.Not effective in snow, indeed.As Johnny states, the N57 is less reliable. I have consistently preferred a six-cylinder engine over a four-cylinder. However, aside from requiring a new chain at about 100,000 miles, the N47/B47 would be my preferred option.

M Sport Plus, preferably with an automatic gearbox, however I will accept the M Sport variant with Harman Kardon speakers. Is there anything else I should specifically be seeking?

The 3LT is indisputably superior, however specifications are crucial based on individual preferences.

Thank you for the counsel. I am eager to test drive both models; however, they are difficult to locate locally with the appropriate year, specifications, and miles. I prefer not to test drive a vehicle in which I lack genuine purchasing intent. I will likely travel south to procure one and return if everything is OK. In addition to evident concerns such as knocks or wobbles, what specific indicators should I observe or auditory cues should I heed during the test drive to identify potential faults with these vehicles?

The six-cylinder engine is far more refined and powerful; but, the N57 is prone to bottom-end damage, which may be rather expensive to repair. As the engine ages, its prevalence is increasing. The four-cylinder engine will be the B47, which has demonstrated greater reliability than its N47 predecessor. I recommend test-driving the 420d with the ZF8 automatic gearbox to assess its performance, as it is not a sluggish vehicle.

Thank you for your response. The prevailing consensus indicates that the 430D is a more sophisticated vehicle. Opinions on xDrive versus regular drivetrain?

Both are commendable; nevertheless, the six-cylinder 430d is in a distinct category. Efficient, rapid, and only little less fuel-efficient. For me, the driving experience is far superior with the six-cylinder diesel engine. Salutations